Exploitation evidence
Verified attacker activity receives the strongest weighting.
Transparent vulnerability prioritisation
A public 0–100 indicator of how strongly current evidence supports operational attention. It is designed to explain priority, not replace organisational risk assessment.
Interpretation
Immediate investigation, mitigation or remediation.
Prioritised exposure and applicability assessment.
Monitor evidence and establish local exposure.
Low immediate concern without additional context.
Deterministic model
Every factor has a published maximum. The same evidence always produces the same score.
Verified attacker activity receives the strongest weighting.
KEV inclusion and ransomware association provide authoritative context.
Predictive exploitation probability, transformed onto a 20-point curve.
Measures whether exploitation is theoretical, demonstrated or operationalised.
Reflects the potential for vulnerable technology to be internet reachable.
Recognises the attacker value of products deployed at meaningful scale.
Uses CVSS for technical impact without allowing it to dominate the Signal.
20 × √EPSS probabilityThe square-root curve recognises meaningful probability movement without allowing EPSS alone to dominate verified exploitation evidence.
Published rules
30 / 20 / 10 / 012 / 320 × √probability10 / 8 / 5 / 2 / 010 / 6 / 25 / 3 / 10–10Separate from score
Signal confidence describes the quality, agreement and recency of the supporting sources. It never adds points to the vulnerability score.
Deliberate limitation
Organisational asset criticality is excluded. Only the organisation knows its business importance, data sensitivity, network position, compensating controls, ownership and operational constraints.
Signal is an evidence-led starting point. Your environment determines the final priority.Worked examples
The combination of confirmed exploitation, KEV inclusion, very high EPSS and an internet-facing edge product makes this an operational priority despite a CVSS score below 9.0.
The theoretical impact is high, but exploitation probability is very low and there is no KEV or active-exploitation evidence.